Saturday, March 17, 2012

Revision of tax slabs and its impact on tax outgo

Quick analysis of revision of tax slabs and its impact on tax outgo.  Overall male tax payers less than 60 years of age benefits the most and there is now no differentiation between male and female tax payers.

Tax slab revision and its impact



Click here for full page link.

Impact of Budget 2012 on Individual Tax Payers

I have tried to calculate the tax implications of various announcements made in Budget 2012 for individual tax payers. The calculations are carried out for individuals with income slabs for Rs. 3 lakhs, Rs. 5 lakhs, Rs. 10 lakhs, Rs. 15 lakhs and Rs. 20 lakhs.
Budget 2012 and Individual Taxpayers


Click here for full screen link.

Modified version of the above table appeared in DNA Newspaper dated 17th March 2012.

Friday, March 16, 2012

“I MUST BE CRUEL ONLY TO BE KIND”

Impact of budget on an individual taxpayer 

Honourable Finance Minister quoted Shakespeare's immortal words “I must be cruel only to be kind” before beginning his speech on tax proposals.  However for an individual, the budget seems to be a mix of kind and cruel treatment.  Kind enough to tweak the tax slabs favorably and providing additional tax deduction avenues in the form of interest income from savings account deposit and preventive medical check-up and cruel enough to take the entire benefit by way of increase in service tax and excise duty rates. 

THE KIND TREATMENT

The largest benefit given to individual tax payers in the budget is the favourable revision of tax slabs.  The exemption limit has been increased from Rs. 1,80,000 to Rs. 2,00,000 for all individuals (males and females aged less than 60 years).   Taxable income more than Rs. 8,00,000 and less than Rs. 10,00,000 which currently is taxed at 30% shall be taxed at 20% after the budget announcement.  This is a clear benefit of Rs. 20,000 for individuals earning more than Rs. 8,00,000.  The revised tax slabs now are - 10% tax rate for taxable income greater than Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000; 20% tax rate for taxable income greater than Rs. 5,00,000 to Rs. 10,000,000 and 30% tax rate for taxable income greater than Rs. 10,000,000.

The deductions available for individuals have also increased by making interest income from saving account deposits up to Rs. 10,000 eligible for deduction from taxable income.  In addition, the finance minister has introduced one more avenue for tax deduction – Rajiv Gandhi Equity Scheme (RGES).  Though the details of the scheme are not cleared, investment in equity up to Rs. 50,000 shall be eligible for 50% deduction for individuals earning less than Rs. 10 lakhs.  However, such investment shall have locked in of 3 years.

Further,  expenditure incurred for preventive medical check-up for self, spouse, dependent children or parents up to Rs. 5,000 shall be eligible to be included under overall deduction of Rs. 15,000 under Section 80D.

There are further smaller relief like reduction in the securities transaction tax on delivery based transactions of equity securities from 0.125% to 0.1% of the transaction value and increase in threshold from Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 5,000 for deducting tax on interest from debentures.  Further both listed and non-listed debentures get covered now under the above criteria.

Last year, budget incorporated a provision that the life insurance premium, in order to get benefit under Section 80C, should not be more than 20% of the actual capital sum assured.  Now the budget has proposed that the premium should not be more than 10% of the actual capital sum assured.  This is good for the customers, since this shall result in enhanced insurance coverage for the same amount of premium.  Further the budget also specifies in detail how the capital sum assured shall be calculated so that insurance company do not circumvent this provision by varying the sum assured from year to year. 

THE CRUEL TREATMENT

The cruelest shock in the budget for individuals is the increase in service tax rate from 10% to 12%.  There has also been hike in excise duty rates and this along with service tax rate increase almost negate the benefit of tax savings on account of slab revision.  This shall maintain the inflationary pressure on the prices and shall ensure that interest rates of loan remain high for substantial part of the year.

Further w.e.f October 2012, sale of residential property for transaction value more than Rs. 50 lakhs in specified urban agglomeration or Rs. 20 lakhs in any other area shall attract tax deduction at source of 1% of the transaction value irrespectively whether the transfer is profitable or not.  Individuals cannot evade this, since it has been made mandatory to provide proof of tax deduction while registering the transfer.

Cash purchase of bullion and jewellery for amount more than Rs. 2 lakhs shall lead to tax collection of 1% of the value by the seller.

In case, one has any asset located outside India (financial or otherwise), he has to compulsorily file return of income in India irrespective of whether he has taxable income or not. 

BEING SIXTY GETS MORE SWEETER

After reducing the senior citizen age limit from 65 years to 60 years last year, the fascination of Mr. Mukherjee for senior citizen continues and he has exempted them from paying advance tax in case they do not earn any income from business and profession.  Further the age limits in Section 80D (Health Insurance Premium) and Section 80DDB (treatment of specified ailment) and for no tax deduction certificate has been rationalized to 60 years from 65 years at present. 

Thus it can be seen that the budget is a mixed bag of kind and cruel treatment for an individual taxpayer. 

Modified version of the article to appear in DNA Newspaper dated 17th March 2012

Monday, March 5, 2012

Better to disregard the notification on tax return filing exemption


As expected, Central Board of Direct Taxes has issued a new notification last month to exempt salaried tax payers with income not exceeding Rs. 5,00,000 from filing income tax returns.  The notification stipulates various conditions (same as previous year’s) which are required to be satisfied to be eligible for the exemption.

One can read the conditions required to be satisfied in Bachhat previous year’s article here.  The article also list down the scenarios where the benefit shall not be available. 

Subsequent to Bachhat's article, CBDT also released FAQs on the last year’s notification.  Since the essence of current year’s notification remains the same, same FAQs can be applied to it.  Let us review few FAQs in this post to understand who shall stand benefited for the exemption.

Suppose Manish has a salary income of Rs. 6,20,000.  His interest income from savings bank account is Rs. 10,000 and as required by the notification, he has reported his interest income to the employer and tax has been deducted thereon.  Thus his Gross Total Income (as per tax parlance) is Rs. 6,30,000 for the year.  Now he is claiming deduction under Section 80C of Rs. 1,00,000 by investing in PPF, paying life insurance premium, etc.  Further he has invested Rs. 20,000 in tax saving infra bonds under Section 80CCF. He also claims deduction of Rs. 15,000 under Section 80D for health insurance premium paid on health policies.  In total, he has paid / invested Rs. 1,35,000 (Rs. 1,00,000 + Rs. 20,000 + Rs. 15,000) under various tax saving instruments.  Thus his Total Income (again as per tax parlance) is Rs. 4,95,000 (Rs.6,30,000 – Rs. 1,35,000) for the year.  Whether Manish is exempted from filing his tax return as per the notification?

Yes. One needs to consider the ‘total income’ of Rs. 4,95,000 and not the ‘gross total income’ of Rs. 6,20,000 to check whether he is qualified for exemption under the notification.  Thus in our example, Manish is qualified to take exemption and shall not be required to file income tax return for the year.

Let us add one more criteria to the above example.  Now suppose Manish has donated Rs.10,000 during the year and is eligible for the deduction under Section 80G. 

In this case, exemption available to Manish shall be withdrawn since as per the current guidelines, employers are not required to take cognizance of donations made while deducting TDS, unless the donation is to Prime Minister’s Relief Fund, Chief Minister’s Relief Fund or Lt. Governor’s Relief Fund.  Hence, Manish’s employer will not consider donation of Rs. 10,000 and shall deduct tax on the same and Manish shall be required to file return of income to claim refund of tax.

Similarly if one is claiming deduction of interest paid on housing loan, he is not qualified for the exemption even though after the deduction his ‘total income’ does not exceeds than Rs. 5,00,000.  The reason being the notification is applicable only if the individual has salary income and income from savings bank account.  Hence he shall be required to file the return even though the entire tax is deducted by the employer and no further tax is payable.

As Bachhat stated last year, it would have made more sense if the circular had exempted all tax payers with income not exceeding Rs. 5,00,000 provided all required taxes are paid (either by way of TDS, Advance Tax or Self-Assessment Tax) and PAN number has been quoted at the time of payment of these taxes.

Hopefully, better sense shall prevail during DTC and we shall see some amendment.  Till then, it is wise to disregard this notification.